VII. List of references68

Altieri, Miguel A and Peter Rosset. 1999. “Diez Razones que Explican por qué la Biotecnología no Garantizará la Seguridad Alimentaria, ni Protegerá el Ambiente ni Reducirá la Pobreza en el Tercer Mundo” (available at _que_Explican_por_qué_la_Biotec_2.htm)

Anton, Donald K. 2000. A Model Act for the Comprehensive Regulation of Gene Technology 2000, A bill for an Act to regulate all activities and dealing involving gene technology, and for related purposes

Arntzen, Charles. 1995. Oral immunization with a recombinant bacterial antigen produced in transgenic plants. Science 268: 714–716

Asante-Owusu, Rachel. 1999. GM technology in the forest sector. WWF International, Gland, Switzerland

Balkrishna, P. 2001. Agriculture and Biodiversity. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland

Balakrisna, P. 2002. “Assessing and Managing Risks: Biotechnology and Biosafety” (IUCNAsia, Workshop paper

Bauer, Martin W., and George Gaskell.(eds.) 2002. Biotechnology: The Making of a Global Controversy (Cambridge University Press).

Bereano, Phil. 1999. Report on Danish “Citizen Consensus Conference” on Genetically Engineered Foods, March 12–15 (Luka group)

Bergelson, Joy, Colin Purrington and Gale Wichmann. 1998. Promiscuity in transgenic plants. Nature 395: 25 [CrossRef]

BioTIK Expert Group (Danish Ministry of Trade and Industry). An ethical foundation for genetic engineering choices, (online, 1999, updated),

Bonalume, Ricardo. 1999. Brazillian farmers fighting against legal barriers to GM crops. Nature 402: 344. [CrossRef]

Brauner, Ruth and Beatrix Tappeser. 2001. “Development of environmental indicators for monitoring of genetically modified plants”, Summary of a research and development project. German Federal Environmental Agency.

Brundtland Commission (World Commission on Environment and Development). 1987. Our Common Future, Oxford Press (1987)

Canadian Food Inspection Authority. 1994. Regulatory Directive (Dir. 94-08): Assessment Criteria for Determining Environmental Safety of Plants with Novel Traits (accessible at

Christensen, M., 2001. The Precautionary Principle and GMOs: An Australasian Perspective, IUCN-ELP Newsletter, vol. 1/2001

Chevre A. M., F. Eber, A.Baranger,and M.Renard, 1997. Gene flow from transgenic crops. Nature 389: 924 [CrossRef]

Colledge W. H., B. S. Abella, and K.Souther. 1995. Generation and characterisation of a F508 cystic fibrosis mouse model. NatureGenetics 10: 445 [CrossRef]

Collins, Harry and Trevor Pinch. 1998. The Golem: What You Should Know about Science; and 2002, The Golem At Large: What You Should Know about Technology (Cambridge University Press)

Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament 2003, “Life Sciences and Biotechnology – A strategy for Europe progress report and future orientations”

Commoner, Barry. Unraveling the DNA Myth: The spurious foundation of genetic engineering, Harper’s Magazine, February, 2002, p.39

Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity. 2000. Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (decision EM-I/3, 29 January)

Dawkins, Kristin and Neil Sorensen, “Labeling and Traceability of Bioengineered Foods” (available at US Department of State; also available as “Etiquetado y Rastreo de los Alimentos Producto de la Bioingenieria”, and as “L’étiquetage et la traçabilité des aliments transgéniques”étiquetage_et_la_traçabilité_des_aliments_tra.doc)

Declarations and Recommendations of the 6th Southern Africa Biodiversity Forum (Pretoria, 28–30 Nov 2001) (looseleaf)

Drèze, J., A Sen, and A. Hussain (eds.) “The Political Economy of Hunger,” Clarendon, Oxford, 1995

Drucker, Graham, Horst Freiberg, Jackie van Goethem, ed. 2001. Pan-European Workshop on “Building the CHM Partnership: Facilitating Scientific and Technical Cooperation” 28.–29. September 2001, Stucksaal Botanical Garden Bonn, Germany. German Centre for Documentation and Information in Agriculture (ZADI) and German Federal Agency for Nature Conservation (BfN)

“European Commission Says GMO Ban to Remain in Place for another Two Years,” International Environment Reporter vol. 24, No. 22 (BNA, October 24,2001)

European Council Directive 98/81/EC of 26 October 1998...on the contained use of genetically modified micro-organisms

European Parliament Directive 98/44/EC...on the legal protection of biotechnological inventions

European Parliament Directive 2001/18/EC...on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms...

FAO: AG21 Magazine, 2002, “Toward Safe Trade: At 50, the IPPC adapts to new Challenges” (FAO Agriculture Department)

Freese, Bill. 2002. “Manufacturing Drugs and Chemicals in Crops” (available at

FRESCO Louise O. 2001. “Genetically Modified Crops” FAO:AG21 Magazine

Fukuama, Francis. 2002. “Gene Regime,” Foreign Policy Magazine

Gaia Foundation (various authors). 2003. A catalogue of 2002 GE disasters (available at

Goklany, Indur M. 2001. The Precautionary Principle: A Critical Appraisal of Environmental Risk Assessment (esp. Chapter 3 “The Risks and Rewards of Genetically Modified Crops” (Cato Institute)

Heinemann, J.A (unpublished, as yet, book chapter) “Challenges to regulating the industrial gene: Views inspired by the New Zealand Experience”

Ho, Mae-Wan, Angela Ryan, and Joe Cummins, (undated), Cauliflower Mosaic, Viral Promoter - A Recipe for Disaster? (available at

Holland, L. 2000. China embraces GM crops. Far Eastern Economic Review Formal Statement of the US, Proceedings of the Second World Conservation Congress. (IUCN, publ.2001).

James, C. 2001. PREVIEW Global Review of Commercialised Transgenic Crops: 2002 (International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications)

Kapuscinski, Anne R., Robert M Goodman, et al. 2003. “Making ‘safety first’ a reality for biotechnology products”, Nature Biotechnology, vol. 21, No.6

Karow, Julia. 2001. Reading the Book of Life. Scientific American: Explore! (accessible at http://www-scoa,-cp,/explorations/2001/021201humangenome/index.html)

Katerere, Jennifer M. 2001. The Precautionary Principle: Implications for Development and Poverty Alleviation in Southern Africa, IUCN-ELP Newsletter, vol. 1/2001

Krattiger, A.F. 2002. Public-Private Partnerships for Efficient Proprietary Biotech Management and Transfer and Increased Private Sector Investments (UNIDO, bioDevelopments)

Leutwyler, Kristin. 1998. It’s Not all in the Genes. Scientific American: Explorations. (accessible at

Lomborg, Bjørn. 2001. The Skeptical Environmentalist (Cambridge University Press, 2001)

Mackenzie, Ruth, Françoise Burhenne-Guilmin, 2003. An Explanatory Guide to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (IUCN Environmental Policy and Law Paper No. 46) IUCN and FIELD

Manale, Andrew P. 2003. “Why the Controversy Over Genetically Modified Organisms in the European Union?” International Environment Reporter (BNA)

McNeely, Jeffrey A and S.J. Scherr, 2001. Common Ground, Common Future: How Ecoagriculture can Help Feed the World and Conserve Wild Biodiversity. IUCN and Future Harvest, Washington, DC.

Mead, Aroha, 19__. Sacred Balance, Cultural and Spiritual Values of Biodiversity UNEP, available at

Moeller, David R. 2001. OGM Amenazas de Responsabilidad Civil para los Agricultores: Cuestiones legales que rodean a la Plantación de Cultivos Modificados Genéticamente (available at Responsabilidad_Civil_para_los.htm)

Mulder, H. and K. Ree, editors. 1996. Proceedings, Knowledge Influences/Influenced, National Day Science Shops,

Murray, D.R. (ed.). 1990. “Advanced Methods in Plant Breeding and Biotechnology” (CABI).

Nestle, Marion. 2001. Genetically engineered golden rice and vitamin A deficiency. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 101: 289–290. [CrossRef]

New Zealand’s Royal Commission on Genetic Modification. 2001. The Commission’s report and the evidence received found at

Nijar, Gurdial Singh. 2000. Developing a Liability and Redress Regime Under the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (available

Nill, Kimball R. 2001. Glossary of Biotechnology Terms (Technomic Publishing) (available online at

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2001. Environmental Indicators for Agriculture, Methods and Results, Executive Summary

Paarlberg, Robert L. 2000. Governing the GM Crop Revolution: Policy Choices for Developing Countries (IFPGRI, Food Agriculture and the Environment Discussion Paper 33)

Paustenbach, Dennis J. 1995. Retrospective on U.S Health Risk Assessment: How Others Can Benefit. RISK: Health, Safety & Environment (accessible at

Rao, P.K. 2001. Environmental Trade Disputes and the WTO (Pinninti Publishers)

Rifkin, Jeremy 1992. Beyond Beef: The Rise and Fall of the Cattle Culture (Plume)

Rodgers H.J., and H.C. Parkes. Transgenic plants and the environment. Journal of Experimental Botany, 46: 467–488.

Royal Society of Canada. 2001. Elements of precaution: Recommendation for the regulation of food biotechnology in Canada. Ottawa, Canada.

Safford, D. 2003. “Legal Holes May Exist in Regulatory Net for Genetically Altered Fish” International Environment (BNA).

Seminar papers: “Séminaire BIBios/UNITAR sur la Biosécurité”:

Bordogna, Barara “Introduction aux biotechnologies dans le domaine agro-alimentaire”

Kaufmann, Alain “Biosécurité et démocratisation des choix technologiques”

Rapport sur l‘etatde l’avancement des travaux de RIBIos. (2003)

Sancy, Mary “Le principe de precaution et le droit international de l’environnement”

Syngenta “Contribution to WHO Study on Modern Food Biotechnology, Human Health and Development” electronic forum discussion; and bibliography entitled “Key Scientific Studies on the Impacts of Biotechnology”

Sen, A. 1981. “Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlements and Deprivation,” Clarendon, Oxford

Sixth Southern Africa Biodiversity Forum, Pretoria, South Africa, 28–30 November 2001. Declaration and Recommendations

Spranger, Tade Matthias. 2002. “Europe’s Biotech Patent Landscape: Conditions and Recent Developments” (reprint)

Tabashnik, B.E. 1994. Evolution of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis. Annual Review of Entomology 39: 47–79 [CrossRef]

Tapper, Richard. 2000. Application of the Precautionary Principle to Biosafety, IUCN-ELP Newsletter, vol. 1/2000

Teitel, Martin and Kimberly A. Wilson. 2001. Genetically Engineered Food: Changing the Nature of Nature (Park Street Press)

The Cornerhouse. 1998. Briefing 10 - Food? Health? Hope?: Genetic Engineering and World Hunger (available at:

The Mar de Plata Declaration (IFOAM 12th Scientific Conference, 16–19 Nov, 2002) and various IFOAM pamphlets

U.N Food and Agriculture Organisation. 2002. The State of Food and Agriculture 2001, available at

United Nations Environment Programme, GEF Coordination Office. 2001. Background Note for the Interactive Environment Forum on the UNEP/GEF Biosafety Project.

UNSW Press and CABI, 2003, “Seeds of Concern- the Genetic Manipulation of Plants”

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1999. USDA position on insect resistant management in Bt crops. 27 May

Van Aken. 2000. “Genetically engineered bacteria U.S. lets bad gene out of the bottle.” Greenpeace reportM, January

Villar, Juan López. 2001. GMO Contamination Around the World (available at

Wambugu, Florence M. 2001. Modifying Africa: how biotechnology can benefit the poor and hungry, a case study from Kenya. Nairobi, Kenya

Wiseman, Rachel and Sandra Gagnon. “Scoping Agriculture, and Biodiversity (Draft),” IUCN internal document (2003)

Wolfenbarger, L.L. and P.R. Phifer. 2000. The Ecological Risks and Benefits of Genetically Engineered Plants, Science, 15 December, 2000, at 2088–2093

World agriculture: towards 2015/2030 (

World Business Council for Sustainable Development (Scenario Unit), “Biotechnology Scenarios: 2000–2050 Using the Future to Explore the Present” (WBCSD, undated)

World Health Organisation. 2000. Safety Aspects of Genetically Modified Foods of Plant Origin: Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation on Foods Derived from Biotechnology. UN Doc. WHO/SDE/PHE/FOS/00.6

Wright, Susan. 2001. Legitimating Genetic Engineering (accessible at

Young, Tomme. 1992. Analysis of the California Hazard Communication and Toxic Enforcement Act: Expectations and Realities of Proposition 65, Daily Journal, September.1992

Zitner, Aaron. 2000. Splicing the sting out of bugs. LA Times April 9: 10–22

In addition, research for this paper included a wide-ranging survey of internet papers and websites in which GMO and biotechnology issues are addressed in an in-depth or substantive fashion. These include websites of –

Convention on Biological Diversity:
Environment News Service:
Food and Agriculture Organization:;
Friends of the Earth Europe:
Friends of the Earth Australia:
International Plant Protection Convention:
Institute of Science In Society:
Southeast Asian Regional Initiatives for Community Empowerment (SEARICE):
Union of Concerned Scientists:
Institute for Social, Economic and Ecological Sustainability:

NOTE: The above list of websites is not exhaustive, in that it was not generated at the time of the research, but out of the print-outs and other documents on hand at the time of the final revision of this paper. Other sites of great value are available. It is hoped that this list will provide a starting place for further research, when undertaken.

68In response to several requests for assistance and references at various times in the writing of this paper, IUCN members, commission members and staff submitted a number of articles and other documents and references. In some cases, the full publication information was not available (where articles were photocopied and faxed or mailed, for example.) All such resources are included in this list, if they were relevant to the paper. Readers unable to find a particular resource are encouraged to contact the ELC, where many of the more obscure documents listed here will remain on file.

< previous section  < index >  next section >