Log in

You will be redirected to IUCN Accounts to input your credentials. After log in you will be redirected back to this site.

Rest assured your personal data resides with IUCN and IUCN only. For more information please review our Data policy.

WCC 2016 Res 083 - Progress Report

General information
IUCN Constituencies implementing this Resolution
IUCN Members: 
Sociedad Geológica de España ( SGE ) / Spain
Sociedad Española para la Defensa del Patrimonio Geológico y Minero ( SEDPGYM ) / Spain
International Association for the Conservation of Geological Heritage ( ProGEO ) / Sweden
IUCN Commissions: 
FB17E09E-5094-E611-97F4-005056BA6623
IUCN Secretariat: 
Yes
Other non-IUCN related organisations: 
UNESCO Ecological and Earth Sciences Division
Implémentation
Indicate which actions have been carried out to implement this Resolution : 
Convene stakeholders/Networking
Fundraising
Describe the results/achievements of the actions taken: 
Limited direct results to date, and no reports from involved IUCN members were submitted. A WCPA best practice guideline on geoheritage and protected areas is advancing but still at a pre-draft stage. Financial support for its preparation has been secured by IUCN Secretariat from the Republic of Korea (Cultural Heritage Administration).
The WCPA Geoheritage Specialist Group (GSG) will convene in April with the support of BfN Germany to discuss its work programme, and the main IUCN members behind this resolution will be represented, so it is expected the resolution could be discussed at that point. However the scope of the resolution is beyond the mandate of WCPA.
What challenges/obstacles have been encountered in the implementation of this Resolution and how were they overcome : 
This report from the Secretariat focal point (Tim Badman, Director IUCN World Heritage Programme) has not been able to draw on any reports from members. I consider the challenges faced relate to lack of resources, and lack of clear and broadly based IUCN constituency on this issue. In my view the most promising means to consider implementation would be to discuss a partnership approach with UNESCO Science Sector.
Briefly describe what future actions are needed for the implementation of this Resolution: 
As above, I consider that there is a need for a decision on the possible strategy, and whether there is the means to resource action. From a strategic point of view, a discussion on partnership with UNESCO is advisable.
Are these actions planned for yet: 
No
Status of implementation
Status of implementation for this Resolution: 
Not started: implementation not started