Log in

You will be redirected to IUCN Accounts to input your credentials. After log in you will be redirected back to this site.

Rest assured your personal data resides with IUCN and IUCN only. For more information please review our Data policy.

WCC 2016 Rec 102 - Activity Report

General Information
IUCN Constituent: 
3993ACA6-E1A1-E611-B6EC-005056BA6623
Period covered: 
2019
Geographic scope: 
North America and the Caribbean
Country/Territory: 
Canada
In implementing this Resolution your organization has worked/consulted with...
IUCN Members: 
Parks Canada Agency - Agence Parcs Canada / Canada
IUCN Commissions: 
FB17E09E-5094-E611-97F4-005056BA6623
IUCN Secretariat: 
No
Implementation
Indicate and briefly describe any actions that have been carried out to implement this Resolution: 
ActionDescriptionStatus
Policy influencing/advocacyEvaluating natural heritage areas to determine if they are protected areas or OECMSOn-going
Please report on the result /achievement of the actions taken: 
Determined whether the natural heritage areas were PAs or OECMs and if they would count towards Aichi 11
What challenges have you encountered in implementing this Resolution and what measures have you taken to overcome them?: 
Since some activities and infrastructure are impact gradients determining what is "environmentally damagining" can be challenging. I use the scientific literature to help me determine what should be excluded and what is OK. roads are an example of an impact gradient from trail to super highway. .
Identify and briefly describe what future actions are planned for the implementation of this Resolution: