Log in

You will be redirected to IUCN Accounts to input your credentials. After log in you will be redirected back to this site.

Rest assured your personal data resides with IUCN and IUCN only. For more information please review our Data policy.

WCC 2020 Res 122 - Progress Report

General information
IUCN Constituencies implementing this Resolution
IUCN Members: 
Fundación MarViva / Costa Rica
Association Française du Fonds Mondial pour la Nature - France ( WWF - France ) / France
Fauna & Flora International ( FFI ) / United Kingdom
Synchronicity Earth ( SE ) / United Kingdom
SYLVIA EARLE ALLIANCE (DBA MISSION BLUE) ( SEA ) / United States of America
IUCN Commissions: 
IUCN World Commission on Environmental Law 2021-2025 (WCEL)
IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas 2021-2025 (WCPA)
IUCN Secretariat: 
Yes
Other non-IUCN related organisations: 
Deepsea conservation coalition (DSCC), WWF, WILDTRUST
Implementation
Indicate which actions have been carried out to implement this Resolution : 
Convene stakeholders/Networking
Policy influencing/advocacy
Describe the results/achievements of the actions taken: 
• Much of the following done in close collaboration with IUCN France Committee and members.

• Organization of an expert panel discussion on IUCN Resolution 122 in the lead up to CBD COP15, the upcoming CBD SBSTTA meeting and other ocean conservation-related events in 2022. Webinar covered science and equity, issues of governance, social licence, finance, liability, and alternatives for a decarbonised future. Replay webinar 1 and webinar 2.

• Attendance to the 27th Session of the International Seabed Authority Council and Assembly Meetings:
o From 21 March-1 April 2022;
o From 18 July to 5th August 2022; and
o From 31 October-11 November 2022



• Promotion at UNFCCC COP27 in consultation with Government of Chile

• Contribution to DeepSea Day on 5th December

• Update of the IUCN issues brief: Deep-sea mining - resource | IUCN

What challenges/obstacles have been encountered in the implementation of this Resolution and how were they overcome : 
• Limited capacity to follow the ISA proceedings, especially as remote attendance is not always made possible by the ISA Secretariat. Sending a representative for IUCN has helped follow and intervene on behalf on the Union.
• Lack of transparency from ISA
• Not having a unified language – moratorium is putting some stakeholders off in openly supporting the resolution.
Briefly describe what future actions are needed for the implementation of this Resolution: 
• As the Government of Nauru notified the ISA in June 2021 of their intention to start deep-sea mining triggering a rush to finalise the ISA regulations by summer 2023, IUCN will continue pushing for a moratorium unless and until the conditions detailed in resolution 122 are met.
• Continue to building a coalition of willing using international gatherings (COPs etc…) to gain and maintain momentum
Are these actions planned for yet: 
Yes
Status of implementation
Status of implementation for this Resolution: 
On-going: implementation consisting of repetitive, recurrent action (attending meetings, reporting, etc.)
Additional information