Log in

You will be redirected to IUCN Accounts to input your credentials. After log in you will be redirected back to this site.

Rest assured your personal data resides with IUCN and IUCN only. For more information please review our Data policy.

WCC 2016 Res 016 - Activity Report

General Information
IUCN Constituent: 
BirdLife International
IUCN Constituent type: 
IUCN Member
Period covered: 
2019
Geographic scope: 
Global
In implementing this Resolution your organization has worked/consulted with...
IUCN Members: 
Zoological Society of London ( ZSL ) / United Kingdom
Conservation International ( CI ) / United States of America
NatureServe / United States of America
Re:wild / United States of America
IUCN Commissions: 
F717E09E-5094-E611-97F4-005056BA6623
IUCN Secretariat: 
Yes
Other non-IUCN related organisations: 
University of Rome La Sapienza, Arizona State University, Texas A&M University, Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, Botanical Gardens Conservation, International, French National Centre for Scientific Research, CBD, IPBES, UN Division for Sustainable Development (SDGs)
Implementation
Indicate and briefly describe any actions that have been carried out to implement this Resolution: 
ActionDescriptionStatus
Education/Communication/Raising awarenessOn-going
FundraisingOn-going
Policy influencing/advocacyOn-going
Scientific/technical activitiesOn-going
Please report on the result /achievement of the actions taken: 
The RLI was included in the 2019 SDG report with data for each country updated in the UN SDG indicator database. The RLI and various disaggregations were included in the IPBES Global Assessment, published in May 2019, with the indicators extrapolated to 2020 to assess progress towards the Aichi Targets and to 2030 for the SDGs. The RLI and various disaggregations are profiled in the draft Global Biodiversity Outlook-5 which is currently out for review and due to be published in 2020. Relevant disaggregations of the RLI were provided to the Convention on Migratory Species via UNEP-WCMC to support a review of the CMS Strategic Plan for Migratory Species. RLIs, disaggregated to national level, were included in the ‘country profiles’ on the Integrated Biodiversity Assessment Tool, and made available to CBD national focal points, among others (see link below). The RLI was included in the newly launched Biodiversity Indicators Partnership Dashboard. The EU-funded INSPIRE4Nature project, led by the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS), involving four IUCN Red List Partners, to train 15 PhD students, including one whose PhD focuses on the Red List Index.
What challenges have you encountered in implementing this Resolution and what measures have you taken to overcome them?: 
The main challenge to the delivery of an updated RLI is the lack of funding and priority afforded to reassessments. No groups completed reassessments in 2019. Birds are due to be reassessed in 2020. The completion of the mammal reassessment which was due in 2016 will be largely complete by 2020, but some gaps will remain due to the slow timelines or failure to undertake reassessments by some speci
Identify and briefly describe what future actions are planned for the implementation of this Resolution: 
Future ActionDescription
FundraisingEfforts to raise funding to support reassessments will continue, particularly through the joint Red List Partnership proposal.
Policy influencing/advocacyThe RLI will be promoted as one of the indicators to be used for tracking progress against the new post-2020 framework on biodiversity to be negotiated through the CBD.
Scientific/technical activitiesThe Global Mammal Assessment team aim to submit most remaining mammal reassessments in time for the June 2020 Red List release. The Global Amphibian Assessment team are working on completing amphibian reassessments, but substantial geographic gaps will remain by mid-2020. Methods to automate the production of the RLI will be advanced. A new portal will be developed on the Red List website.
Additional Information