Log in

You will be redirected to IUCN Accounts to input your credentials. After log in you will be redirected back to this site.

Rest assured your personal data resides with IUCN and IUCN only. For more information please review our Data policy.

WCC 2020 Res 040 - Activity Report

General Information
IUCN Constituent: 
International Fund for Animal Welfare
IUCN Constituent type: 
IUCN Member
Period covered: 
2022
Geographic scope: 
Global
European Union (EU)
Meso and South America
North America and the Caribbean
South and East Asia
In implementing this Resolution your organization has worked/consulted with...
IUCN Members: 
Ministerio de Ambiente y Energía ( MINAE ) / Costa Rica
Wildlife Trust of India ( WTI ) / India
World Wide Fund for Nature - International ( WWF ) / Switzerland
IUCN Secretariat: 
Yes
Other non-IUCN related organisations: 
Belgian Customs, INTERPOL, TRAFFIC
Implementation
Indicate and briefly describe any actions that have been carried out to implement this Resolution: 
ActionDescriptionStatus
Capacity-buildingIFAW in partnership with several EU law enforcement agencies, WWF and others is working to improve enforcement of wildlife cybercrime through the EU-funded UNITE project. [OP2; OP4.b]On-going
Convene stakeholders/NetworkingIn May 2021, (after the rafting of the Resolution but prior to its adoption), IFAW in partnership with WWF, INTERPOL, TRAFFIC, BE Customs and with financial support from the EU (ISF) convened a cross-sector workshop to explore trends, emerging issues, challenges and opportunities to strengthen policies to combat wildlife cybercrime. [OP1.a]Completed
Education/Communication/Raising awarenessThrough the Coalition to End Wildlife Trafficking Online, over 11 billion user accounts have been targeted with messaging on wildlife cybercrime. [OP8]On-going
OtherTogether with WWF and TRAFFIC, IFAW continues to support the growth of the Coalition to End Wildlife Trafficking Online, to better enable technology companies to tackle wildlife cybercrime. [OP8; OP4.d]On-going
Policy influencing/advocacyIFAW has participated in opportunities to strengthen relevant legislation for tackling wildlife cybercrime e.g.: EU Digital Service Act, EU EnviCrime Directive, UK Ivory Act and new EU ivory rules in EU Wildlife Trade regulations, EU Strategy to Tackle Organised Crime. [OP4.a]Completed
Scientific/technical activitiesSince April, IFAW has been conducting research to review national legislation and best practices in EU Policies to combat wildlife cybercrime and best practices globally in the private sector, CSOs to address wildlife cybercrime. Results will be published in due course. [OP1.b]On-going
Please report on the result /achievement of the actions taken: 
Through support for the Coalition to End Wildlife Trafficking Online, IFAW and partners have helped global technology companies (primarily in the US, SE Asia and Europe) improve and enforce policies on wildlife cybercrime. The coalition now includes 47 technology companies, including the biggest names in the world. To date over 11 million posts advertising wildlife or wildlife products have been blocked or removed, over 2,300 company staff trained in detecting illegal activity; and more than 11,000 suspect listings flagged with companies and enforcement agencies through dedicated cyber-spotter programs, which have lead directly to investigations and prosecutions by a number of governments authorities.

Thanks to policy influencing efforts, the new EU Digital Services Act explicitly references the illegal trade of animals in the definition of “illegal content” to be governed by the DSA. Measures under the DSA should help incentivise better enforcement of wildlife cybercrime by digital services providers in the EU.
What challenges have you encountered in implementing this Resolution and what measures have you taken to overcome them?: 
Digital market places continue to present a large challenge given their huge scale and relative anonymity. Despite improvements in many company policies and some government policies, regulation and enforcement efforts continue to lag behind the scale of effort required to address the problem. Similarly generating financial resources to tackle the problem at scale remains a challenge.
Identify and briefly describe what future actions are planned for the implementation of this Resolution: 
Future ActionDescription
Convene stakeholders/NetworkingAt the forthcoming CoP19 of CITES, IFAW will co-host with Costa Rica a side-event: Creating a coordinated approach to combat wildlife crime linked to the internet – with speakers from law enforcement, CITES MA, NGOs/private sector.
OtherIFAW will continue to support the Coalition to End Wildlife Trafficking Online, to improve company policies, support enforcement efforts, an raise awareness with the public.
Policy influencing/advocacyIFAW will continue to work with law makers in the EU to push for the adoption of an EU Code of Conduct on Wildlife Cybercrime under the new Digital Services Act.
Scientific/technical activitiesIFAW intends to undertake a review of current best practices and loopholes in regulations/policies in the Greater Mekong Region.
Additional Information