Log in

You will be redirected to IUCN Accounts to input your credentials. After log in you will be redirected back to this site.

Rest assured your personal data resides with IUCN and IUCN only. For more information please review our Data policy.

WCC 2020 Res 093 - Activity Report

General Information
IUCN Constituent: 
IUCN SSC Conservation Genetics Specialist Group 2021-2025
IUCN Constituent type: 
IUCN Species Survival Commission 2021-2025
Period covered: 
2024
Geographic scope: 
Global
In implementing this Resolution your organization has worked/consulted with...
IUCN Members: 
Koninklijke Maatschappij voor Dierkunde van Antwerpen / Belgium
Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt ( IAvH ) / Colombia
Zoologisk Have København ( CZ ) / Denmark
Fondo para la Biodiversidad CONABIO / Mexico
European Association of Zoos and Aquaria ( EAZA ) / The Netherlands
Leo Foundation ( Leo foundation ) / The Netherlands
The Royal Zoological Society of Scotland ( RZSS ) / United Kingdom
Chicago Botanic Garden / United States of America
Society for Conservation Biology ( SCB ) / United States of America
US Department of Agriculture - Forest Service / United States of America
Natural Resources Defense Council ( NRDC ) / United States of America
Center for Plant Conservation ( CPC ) / United States of America
National Tropical Botanical Garden ( NTBG ) / United States of America
US Department of the Interior (Fish and Wildlife Service) ( FWS ) / United States of America
Atlanta Botanical Garden ( ABG ) / United States of America
Re:wild / United States of America
Revive & Restore / United States of America
IUCN Commissions: 
IUCN Species Survival Commission 2021-2025 (SSC)
IUCN Secretariat: 
No
Other non-IUCN related organisations: 
GEO Bon, European Commission, FAO, SPREP, BGCI
Implementation
Indicate and briefly describe any actions that have been carried out to implement this Resolution: 
ActionDescriptionStatus
Capacity-buildingTo help facilitate this Resolution we have also had numerous informal dialogues with key partners interested in better conserving genetic diversity and in ensuring that the full realm of biodiversity (species, genes, ecosystems) are protected. We have engaged with Red List workshops, species action planning workshops, Key Biodiversity Areas, the Green List, Reverse the Red, and others. We have also engaged with key partners such as IUCN GBF Task Force, EAZA, IUCN CPSG, IUCN Rewilding Task Force, and others, and started to liaise with Re:Wild. Completed
Capacity-buildingWe have also contributed to achieving item 4 in the Resolution, “the prioritisation and promotion of collaborative research into the development of an index that (optimally) describes the genomic health of a population/species, and the subsequent application of this index.” A large an global consortium of about 80 researchers and practitioners worked for four years to (a) develop indicators of genetic diversity for monitoring, which can be reported using available, non-DNA based, data, (b) implement extensive outreach, consultation, discussion, and improvement to these indicators based on feedback, including working with the IUCN GBF Task Force, GEO BON, CBD Secretariat, and many Parties and IUCN Members, (c) deploy the indicators in nine countries in a demonstration of their affordability and feasibility, and continuing capacity building and outreach to many people. This resulted in more than a dozen webinars, reaching hundreds of participants, attendance at COP15 and COP16 of the CBD, about 10 scientific publications, and three widely disseminated policy briefs in numerous languages. Momentum around this issue also motivated application for funding, which was achieved through two EU COST Action grants (GBIKE, CA18134; GENOA, CA23121) and a Biodiversa+ project (GINAMO, https://www.biodiversa.eu/2024/04/15/ginamo/). Status Completed
Education/Communication/Raising awarenessAn Issue Brief on eDNA has been publishe in Spring 2024.Completed
Education/Communication/Raising awarenessThe IUCN CGSG, through a wide consultation process, helped develop an IUCN Issues Brief on Digital Sequence Information (DSI). This is an important issue that must be addressed while advancing all of the objectives of Resolution 093 and in particular relates to item 3 on the Resolution, “URGES that fair and collaborative research and relevant genetic analysis for non-commercial biodiversity management and safeguarding should be acknowledged and facilitated…” This Issues Brief helped to describe what DSI is, and why it is an important issue. It also explains that “publicly accessible DSI is a tool for scientific research used by the public and private sectors. Much of this research supports sustainable development including advances in medicine, sustainable agriculture, conservation and ecosystem restoration… so researchers’ access to it is important to deliver global sustainable development goals.” This was published in January 2022 and widely shared. This Issue Brief was likely helpful in the COP15 and COP16 negotiations around DSI, and the final DSI agreement does recognize the principles outlined in this Issues Brief, including the use of publicly available DSI for conservation, sustainable use, and ecosystem and species management. Completed
Education/Communication/Raising awarenessTo further contribute to the Resolution especially item 2 and especially on protected area planning as well as biodiversity monitoring, the IUCN CGSG has led an initiative to better define units within species that are warranting protection, assessment and monitoring. These units are often called Evolutionary Significant Units. The group has consulted with numerous experts and created a simple tool that can help determine if a population or area of a species’ range might be considered as an ESU. The tool is designed to support decision making. This work is advanced and should be released in 2025, after which consultations with key partners will continue, to put the ESU approach into action, including for use in assessing ESUsOn-going
Education/Communication/Raising awarenessTo further support implementation of this Resolution, the IUCN CGSG developed an Issues Brief on “How to include hybrids in conservation planning.” Hybrids between species can occur in both plants and animals and increasingly genetic data is showing that hybridization can be common, and may be increasing. Hybridization can be both a threat to the genetic integrity of species and their adaptive potential, as well as an opportunity in some cases providing a necessary infusion of genetic diversity or a specific adaptation to a disease or pest. In some cases this could even save species from extinction. The Issues Brief describes a continuum of hybridization and cycle which combines features of risk assessment with adaptive management to evaluate what to do in each specific case of hybridization. This Issues Brief will be accompanied by a scientific article summarizing the state of the art and going into more detail. The article is titled, “Should they stay or should they go? Considering hybrids in conservation policy and species management” and is in revision for a journal. Both should be published in early 2025. Completed
Education/Communication/Raising awarenessTo help facilitate Resolution item 2 especially about the integration of genetic diversity into ex situ conservation and restoration, the IUCN CGSG led a large team of collaborators from across several IUCN SSC SGs such as CPSG, Seed Conservation, Mushroom, Bracket and Puffball, Animal Biobanking for Conservation and other expert collaborators led a large effort to develop “Biobanking Guidelines for Conservation Purposes”. As explained in this draft document, “Biobanks offer the opportunity to provide such reference points in time and space, but also to monitor and aid conservation planning ex situ and in situ… These Guidelines introduce different biobanking methods and highlight why and how they can help biodiversity conservation. The Guidelines call for and depict standardised approaches from collecting and storing samples to using and sharing data. Lastly, the Guidelines illustrate what international and national regulations have to be considered. This document aims to be a resource that guides the reader through the different decision processes when setting up, running and using biobanks.” Completed
Education/Communication/Raising awarenessTo help facilitate this Resolution, in particular item 1 and 2 on the Resolution about increasing the consideration of genetic diversity into IUCN activities, members of the IUCN CGSG and a range of experts from other IUCN SGs and IUCN Members developed an IUCN Guidance Document (Hvilsom et al. 2022) titled “Selecting species and populations for monitoring of genetic diversity.” As explained in the document itself, “This guidance document aims to be a resource that guides the reader through the decision and evaluation processes that take place when designing a genetic diversity monitoring programme and identifying the most appropriate set of species or populations to monitor. This guidance document is intended for practitioners (including governmental agencies, NGOs, but also locally responsible conservationists such as land managers) who need to monitor genetic diversity of species in the wild.” This document was published in 2022. Completed
Please report on the result /achievement of the actions taken: 
As noted above, the actions produced a number of reports, which were disseminated through the IUCN website, newsletters, policy briefs, webinars, and more. The publications that are finished are “Guidance document on selecting species and populations for genetic monitoring” and “Issue Brief on Digital Sequence Information.” In preparation are a Guidance Document on biobanking and an Issues Brief on hybridization. The ESU action will also be translated into an IUCN document. A major result is that indicators for genetic diversity were incorporated into the Kunming Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, an important, landmark achievement for conservation. The indicator developed for genetic diversity, a key part of this Resolution, is in fact a Headline Indicator under the GBF, “Proportion of populations with an effective size > 500.” Other Complementary Indicators that were developed by the CGSG and colleagues are also part of the GBF. Several countries are already working to report the indicators, and several countries already mention them in their CBD NBSAPs. Moreover, this Headline Indicator has also been integrated into work on the Multidimensional
What challenges have you encountered in implementing this Resolution and what measures have you taken to overcome them?: 
The resolution was too vague. The call for integration into “all IUCN activities” was too ambitious and vague. The Resolution did not name specific partners to be involved, did not call for a specific body to be created such as a Task Force, and did not specifically involve the IUCN Secretariat or Commissions, or wide inclusion of IUCN Members, to help facilitate the work or disseminate new/ ev
Identify and briefly describe what future actions are planned for the implementation of this Resolution: 
Future ActionDescription
Education/Communication/Raising awarenessAn additional area of future action will be to work on standardized genetic diversity assessments. This will involve learning from the IUCN Red List of Species and Ecosystems, assessing the latest science of genetic metrics and indicators, and determining thresholds for signalling rates of loss of genetic diversity that would signal alarm.
Education/Communication/Raising awarenessFuture work beyond this will be to work on the genetic aspects of Key Biodiversity Areas, starting by communicating and linking up with the key groups involved.
Education/Communication/Raising awarenessGenetic aspects play an increasing role in translocations and thus we develop an accompanying paper to the existing translocation guidelines together with TLSG.
Education/Communication/Raising awarenessThe future immediate term actions (2025) are to complete the guidance and issue briefs described above, especially on biobanking, hybridization, and Evolutionary Significant Units. These products are all in advanced drafts and will be published and disseminated widely in 2025.